On 07/16/2016 01:58 PM, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jul 2016, tony mancill wrote:
> 
>>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=binary-indep;users=sanv...@debian.org
>>
>> Hi Santiago,
>>
>> Thanks for the list.  For 806640, the only bug that appears in this list
>> related to mh_install 805228, I will mark it as blocked by 805228, but I
>> won't reassign.
>>
>> It might be worth noting that there are other arch:all packages that
>> FTBFS with the same mh_install issue, but don't appear in your list of
>> binary-indep packages.  Did your test build perhaps exclude packages
>> that are strictly arch:all - as compared to src:libnative-platform-java,
>> which builds both arch:any and arch:all binary packages? [...]
> 
> Yes, I have only tested packages which generate both "Arch: any" and
> "Arch: all" packages, so source packages which only generate "Arch: all"
> packages are excluded from my tests.
> 
> The reason is that those packages are already tested (and reported)
> in the reproducible builds project, so I decided to concentrate
> on packages that nobody tested.

The first two packages I tried, src:pegdown and src:libjbcrypt-java,
both appear in the "successfully built reproducibly" set here [1], and
neither has any bugs assigned to it.  Maybe I'm looking in the wrong place?

In any event, that entire class of bug (I am sure that there are other
instances) will be addressed by the resolution of 805228.

Thank you,
tony

[1]
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/pkg_set_maint_pkg-java-maintainers.html



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Reply via email to