On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 11:13:13AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> What is the expected contract for a package providing ruby-interpreter?
I wish I could tell. Judging from
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging, it seems that
ruby-interpreter requires /usr/bin/ruby. Not sure how official that is.
> Do it just have to offer a /usr/bin/ruby alternative?
As soon as /usr/bin/ruby becomes managed by update-alternatives or
dpkg-divert, ruby itself must drop Multi-Arch: allowed, because it no
longer is in exclusive control of /usr/bin/ruby. So this sounds wrong.
I'm not sure we currently support non-default ruby implementations.
Which indicates that jruby should simply drop the provides.
Not speaking with any ruby hats. Maybe Christian can weigh in with more
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.