Your message dated Fri, 15 Dec 2017 01:17:03 +0000
with message-id <>
and subject line Bug#882596: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #747027,
regarding emma does not work with Java 7 bytecode
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact

Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libemma-java
Version: 2.0.5312+dfsg-4
Severity: grave

Running emma on bytecode generated by openjdk-7's javac fails, but it
works fine on Java code produced by openjdk 6. JDK 6 will not be part
of jessie.

$ cat 
public class Test {

    public static void main(String[] args) {}
$ /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-amd64/bin/javac
$ java -jar /usr/share/java/emma.jar -cp . Test
EMMA: writing [txt] report to [<<DIR>>/coverage.txt] ...
$ rm Test.class 
$ javac
$ java -jar /usr/share/java/emma.jar -cp . Test
EMMA: no coverage data collected at runtime [all reports will be empty]
EMMA: writing [txt] report to [<<DIR>>/coverage.txt] ...
[EMMA v2.0, build 5312debian]
emmarun: [MAIN_METHOD_NOT_FOUND] application class [Test] does not have a 
runnable public main() method
Exception in thread "main" com.vladium.emma.EMMARuntimeException: 
[MAIN_METHOD_NOT_FOUND] application class [Test] does not have a runnable 
public main() method
        at com.vladium.emma.rt.AppRunner._run(
        at emmarun.main(
Caused by: java.lang.VerifyError: Expecting a stackmap frame at branch target 11
Exception Details:
    Test.<init>()V @4: ifnonnull
    Expected stackmap frame at this location.
    0000000: b200 1359 c700 0757 b800 1d03 324c 2ab7
    0000010: 0001 2b03 0454 b1                      

        at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method)
        at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(
        at java.lang.Class.getMethod0(
        at java.lang.Class.getMethod(
        at com.vladium.emma.rt.AppRunner._run(
        ... 3 more

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (980, 'unstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (100, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.13-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libemma-java depends on:
ii  openjdk-6-jre-headless [java2-runtime-headless]  6b30-1.13.2-2
ii  openjdk-7-jre-headless [java2-runtime-headless]  7u51-2.4.6-1

libemma-java recommends no packages.

libemma-java suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

Julian Andres Klode  - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member

See and

Please do not top-post if possible.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.0.5312+dfsg-4+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package emma-coverage has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing

Debian distribution maintenance software
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
Please use for discussions and questions.

Reply via email to