Il 08/05/2018 10:11, Pirate Praveen ha scritto: > On തി, മേയ് 7, 2018 at 11:58 രാവിലെ, Paolo Greppi <[email protected]> > wrote: >> And for many the vcs_git/browser fields are set to anonscm (118) rather than >> salsa (51). BTW of those 118, only 31 have been migrated to salsa. > > Because the migration happened only recently and some packages are in NEW for > 6 months. Also techwolf/Daniel Ring wanted all packages in one place so he > created new packages also in alioth before the migration to salsa.
To address this, I volunteer to migrate to salsa the 118-31=87, using the procedure here: https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/2018-April/025717.html I'd skip the AliothRewriter step because those repo were never really "public". But I'd fix the Vcs-* fields in d/control for all 118. So new uploads would then be required. Would we increase the debian version ? Would those be team uploads ? >> So the backlog could also be due to something that we could improve from our >> end. Any ideas ? > > I think it is just the numbers. I think many of are already trying to reduce > the number of packages, but for existing queue, I think the feasible option > is only more volunteers in ftp team (redoing the work of reducing packages is > extra work I think). > > A radical option could be to bundle all modules per main package and ask them > to reject the individual packages. P -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
