On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 11:51 AM, Xavier <[email protected]> wrote:
Le 08/01/2019 à 23:23, Jérémy Lal a écrit :
 Hi,

 is there a reason to keep both
 node-duplexer2
 node-duplexer3
 packages ?
It seems it's feasible to keep only one, unless we miss a deeper issue ?

 Jérémy

Only 1 difference: node-duplexer2 uses `readable-stream` while
node-duplexer3 uses `stream` but there is a debian patch in
node-duplexer2 that replace `readable-stream` by `stream`, so Debian
package are identical (and so have the same RC bug...).

Full diff is attached.

Reverse-dependencies:
 * node-duplexer2 :
   |
   +-> node-multipipe
   |  |
   |  +-> node-gulp-util
   |      |
   |      +-> gulp & Co
   |
   +-> node-static-module
   |  |
   |  +-> node-brfs
   |
   +-> node-stream-combiner2
      |
      +-> node-module-deps

 * node-duplexer3 :
   |
   +-> node-got
       |
       +-> node-package-json
           |
           +-> node-latest-version
               |
               +-> npm

I think we can drop node-duplexer2 and add Provieds: node-duplexer2 to node-duplexer3. This will also require adding a symlink to duplexer3 from duplexer2 in /usr/lib/nodejs.
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Reply via email to