Quoting Xavier (2019-02-04 11:24:07) > Le Lundi, Février 04, 2019 06:50 CET, Xavier <[email protected]> a écrit: > > > Le 02/02/2019 à 12:11, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > > Quoting Xavier (2019-02-02 11:10:03) > > >> As jsbeautifier installs just one binary we could simply add > > >> Breaks/Provides fields in debian/control to close the bug > > > > > > Indeed it is just one tiny wheeny little binary. > > > > > > Just like "node". > > > > > > Please don't! > > Little resume of available options : > - rename binary => bad option > - diversion => Debian docs says " prefer Conflicts or update-alternatives > - Conflicts/Provides : works > - update-alternatives : needs sync with jsbeautifier > > Which option do we choose ?
There's also the option I proposed: Drop the Node.js binary for now. No, I am super busy, so I will not debate it now. If you insist that something else is clever/safe/okay-ish/whatever then do as you please. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
-- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
