Quoting Pirate Praveen (2019-08-15 08:18:01) > > > On 2019, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 14 11:05:03 PM IST, Jonas Smedegaard > <jo...@jones.dk <mailto:jo...@jones.dk>> wrote: > > Quoting Pirate Praveen (2019-08-14 19:08:47) > >> Hi ruby and js teams, > >> > >> task_list project  provides both ruby and nodejs code from the > > same > >> repo. Currently only ruby-task-list binary package is created. I > > added > >> a new binary package node-deckar01-task-list for the nodejs code, > >> but > > > >> it was rejected by ftp masters . > > > > Did you quote ftpmaster in full in that referenced post written by > > you? > > Yes. > > > > >> They think we should not add a new binary package for this case > >> and instead should use a Provides field and a single binary > >> package. > > > > Do they? In what you reference above I only see Ftpmaster saying > > "We've talked about this." which can frankly mean a lot of different > > things. > > I agree, that is why I asked them to state their position clearly, > first on irc, then on BTS. I even shared the BTS link on irc while we > were discussing. > > This was before the second rejection. On second rejection, I again > asked them to reply on the bug. Do you have any other suggestion to > get an official statement from them?