Hi Melvin, thanks for raising this issue again. We can't just symlink yarn to yarnpkg or rename yarnpkg -> yarn because there's a already a yarn binary in Debian, see: https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=sid§ion=all&arch=any&searchon=contents&keywords=yarn
This was extensively debated in the IPT bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843021#65 and the consensus at the time was that "our" yarn -was to ship only the yarnpkg binary I still think it's confusing and I agree with you that it would be best to use the same name as upstream. I propose to keep this bug open and wait to see what happens; ATM cmdtest is far more popular (as per popcon data) than yarnpkg ... Paolo -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
