Il 13/01/20 07:10, Pirate Praveen ha scritto: > ... > Nopes. FTBFS is rc and people do periodic archive wide rebuilds and this can > get packages removed from testing. I prefer we fix at least important > packages before pushing gulp 4 to unstable. > > gulp package is not an end in itself, but the whole reason gulp was packaged > was to build these packages as its unlikely any end user will want to use > packaged gulp. > > For packages that is likely to be used directly by users, your approach is OK.
Thanks Pravi, I agree. What is the best oneliner to test a package targeting unstable with a mix of selected packages from experimental ? Preferably using https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/meta ... And what about telling salsa CI to do so for us ? ? -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
