Your message dated Sat, 21 Mar 2020 19:49:53 +0100
with message-id <ea3df160-235d-1a4c-81e0-b9b4a7f67...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#954429: node-acorn: Please rename binary to node-acorn
has caused the Debian Bug report #954429,
regarding node-acorn: Please rename binary to node-acorn
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
954429: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=954429
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: node-acorn
Version:
6.2.1+ds+~0.4.0+~4.0.0+really4.0.0+~1.0.0+~5.0.1+ds+~1.7.0+ds+~0.1.1+~0.3.1+~0.2.0+~0.1.0+~0.3.0+~0.3.0-14
Severity: normal
Hi,
node-acorn bu=inary has been renamed to node-debbundle-acorn. Most of
our packages depends on node-acorn which is now a virtual package
provided by node-debbundle-acorn. Versionned dependencies on virtual
packages are known to cause problems, that's why I'd to see
node-debbundle-acorn renamed to node-acorn.
Cheers,
Xavier
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Le 21/03/2020 à 19:24, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> Quoting Xavier (2020-03-21 18:35:13)
>> [...]
>
>> Sorry, I was talking about node-hoek. Broken example with node-sntp.
>> node-hawk isn't broken, node-hoek is (needs nodejs 12)
>
> You were talking about several things, including aptitude, and now about
> node-sntp and node-hoek but still not versions or times.
>
> I would still love to know version(s) and/or time(s) of the problem you
> experienced.
>
> In case that makes it easier, here are two templates you can use, just
> replace "A" "B" and "C" with the correct values:
>
> "I experienced problems with package A version B depending versioned on
> package C"
>
> "I experienced problems with package A (don't remember which version
> exactly but it was around the data B) depending versioned on package C"
OK, OK, I'm probably wrong, let's keep this name even if there was no
reason to change it, it will avoid a new NEW queue delay.
--- End Message ---
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
