On Thursday, June 18, 2020 4:57:52 PM EDT Pirate Praveen wrote: > On 2020, ജൂൺ 19 1:40:09 AM IST, Bastian Blank > <ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> wrote: > >The introduces an unnecessary split into katex and libjs-katex. > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934948#54 > > * User-facing executable programs associated with a library should usually > be packaged in a non-library binary package whose name reflects the program > (for example tappy, flatpak, parted) or collection of related programs (for > example kmod, libsecret-tools, libglib2.0-bin), rather than being bundled > in the same binary package as the runtime library. > > Do you disagree with recommendation of ctte or you don't think it does not > apply here?
You did read the rest of that, right? Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
