Hello, On 2020-11-05 11:37, Paul Wise wrote: > Based solely on the usage information in the README, their APIs are > compatible, so just changing from fn.name to fn-name or vice versa in > the require() call will be enough to switch between them.
Thanks, I will try it. > I'm not sure which one is better, but fn-name started earlier and has > more recent commits than fn.name. I too would say that fn-name should be kept and fn.name should be removed. > I noticed that neither fn-name nor fn-name have any reverse > dependencies in Debian so perhaps they should just both be removed? node-assume, which is yet to be uploaded, depends on fn.name. Once I get to the autopkgtest, I will try drop-in replacing fn.name with fn-name. > I also noticed that fn-name is outdated in Debian compared to upstream. Indeed. I will give it a look. Best, Andrius -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
