On 2021, ജനുവരി 14 8:26:55 PM IST, Jonas Smedegaard <[email protected]> wrote: >> That is not the case here, as node-acorn (>= 6~) cannot be satisfied >> by the real package node-acorn 5.5.3 > >Sounds like you know with great confidence (so I will refrain from >sharing my additional related theories here, to not annoy you further). >
I have seen this bug before and analyzed the situation before as well. >> > Try tighten (build-)dependencies to only possibly match the virtual >> > package. >> > >> >> That is already done. > >Interesting. Then it sounds like a bug in the infrastructure. > > >> > That should lead to the virtual package getting installed. >> > >> >> No it does not, you can try it yourself if you don't believe me. > >I believe you, and I am confident that you are doing the best that you >can (and that "the best that you can" is quite good). > >That said, I do not expect you to be an all-knowing deity (sorry), and >am sharing what as I understand it is the expected behavior of Debian >infrastructure - not directly to say "you are doing it wrong" but >slightly more vaguely aid in moving this issue forward, e.g. through >"oh, I didn't know that detail" or "sure, I know that and that can >definitely be ruled out as a cause". > >Hope that is acceptable clarification. That is fine. > >> > If it leads to no package being resolved or the unacceptably >> > versioned real package getting resolved, then file a severe bug >> > against the resoilver or build environment. >> >> I don't know if that can be a severe bug. But reported against >> aptitude and aspcud now. > >Good. > >If you share bug numbers here it may encourage some reading this to >contribute to solving those bugs. If that was the case already when you >wrote the changelog entry, then for future sake you can consider a "(see >bug#123456)" notice to such changelog antry for the same reason: steer >potential help towards where they do most good instead of bothering busy >developers with silly questions about things already well understood and >ruled out. I opened this bug now and since it affects buster it is unlikely to be part of a buster update, even if we fix these tools in sid/bullseye. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=980099. >Thanks for taking the time to share these details. > > > - Jonas > -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
