On 2021, മാർച്ച് 18 8:22:54 PM IST, Andrius Merkys <mer...@debian.org> wrote: >Hello, > >On 2021-03-15 13:45, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> On 2021, മാർച്ച് 15 4:21:37 PM IST, Nilesh Patra <nil...@disroot.org> wrote: >>>> $ node-sass >>>> /usr/share/nodejs/normalize-package-data/lib/fixer.js:138 >>>> if (!(deps in data)) return >>>> ^ >>> >>> Since node-node-sass is supposed to be used as a library, probably we do >>> not need to vendor this binary: /usr/bin/node-sass -> >>> ../lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/nodejs/node-sass/bin/node-sass >> >> If someone wants to use the binary and someone cares to make it work, we can >> fix it. >> >> If no one steps in to fix this, then we can consider removing it. > >Codesearch does not list any uses of node-sass binary. Thus I think it >is safe to remove it.
How? A command line interface can be used directly by users. Isn't the command supposed to allow compiling .scss files to .css? But I agree if no one is interested to fix this, removing may be the best option now. If someone comes up to fix later, we can add it back. >>> Also maybe this bug should be reassigned to node-normalize-package-data? >> >> Is node-node-sass using a compatible version of node-normalize-path? >> >> May be it is expecting a different API? (If the version node-node-sass >> expects in its package.json is different from the version available in the >> archive, this can happen). > >In package.json, node-node-sass does not mention neither >node-normalize-package-data nor node-normalize-path. > >Best, >Andrius > >-- >Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list >Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net >https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
