Hi Jérémy,
I see... So patching for now I think it's the way to go...
On feb 9 2024, at 5:03 pm, Jérémy Lal <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> Le ven. 9 févr. 2024 à 16:45, Marco Trevisan <[email protected]
> (mailto:[email protected])> a écrit :
> > Hi Jérémy,
> >
> > I've sent a message to the JS mailing list but I wasn't subscribed so it
> > went into moderator list, so not sure if you can handle that.
> >
> > However, I wanted to ask few more things a part that one regarding
> > markdown-it...
> > One dependency I need to tackle for protonbufjs(-cli) is node-jsdoc
> > (that also requires markdown-it...), now I saw that someone recently
> > opened a salsa repo for it at [1], but that's empty so I'm not sure if
> > someone is working on that... I ask you as you might be aware, but feel
> > free to redirect me to the ML otherwise.
> >
> > However, since the chain of changes to get the whole deps packaged could
> > be long, I was wondering if it can be considered acceptable to patch
> > protonbufjs to default not enabling the jsdoc dependency (it's used to
> > generate some commented code), maybe adding a warning mentioning that.
>
>
> I've just did that with node-luxon (in NEW), and distributed the source
> documentation
> in markdown format, but not the jsdoc-generated documentation.
>
> It would be nice to have node-jsdoc in debian, however, it requires a lot of
> work to get there.
>
> Jérémy
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
