On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 02:26:20AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 10:07:44PM +0000, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote: Hello. I went ahead and did exactly that, a no-changes upload.Would the RT accept this for trixie, considering that it's an anomaly that affects a single package and it was trivial to fix? (If yes, I'll file an unblock request).
Thanks for doing that so quick! I see two answers: First answer could be "This seems like it's clearly a violation of Debian policy so it's RC and definitely gets a fix, especially given the debdiff is empty"Second answer could be "The priority field there is a historical artifact and clearly no one cares since the whole archive carried on just fine as-is and no one noticed until they put a strict parser over the archive"
I have no idea which of the two the Release Team would answer with, but, probably one of the two!
Fondly, paultag -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Paul Tagliamonte <paultag> ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ https://people.debian.org/~paultag | https://pault.ag/ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ Debian, the universal operating system. ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀ 4096R / FEF2 EB20 16E6 A856 B98C E820 2DCD 6B5D E858 ADF3
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
