On Tue, 16 Sep 2025 09:28:29 +0200 Yadd <y...@debian.org> wrote: > > Missing dependency can't be considered as serious >
Why is this the case? In my understanding any violation of a MUST directive in Debian Policy is serious, and following 3.5 which states > Every package must specify the > dependency information about other > packages that are required for the first to > work correctly. it will be serious as this policy is a MUST. Where would I reference in regards to making an exception to marking bugs as serious for 3.5, instead marking them important as you have? Otherwise, thank you for your good work and the quick fix! Best Regards, Jonathan Rubenstein
-- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
