Hi,
Your upload of node-uplot 1.6.32+ds1-1 to the NEW queue has had an automated
review: an LLM-based check of its licensing and packaging, run by the DFSG team
using the Debian Inference service. It is not a decision on the package, and -
like other LLM-based work - it can be wrong.
It found 1 blocker, 2 important, 2 minor issues:
- [blocker] [licensing] demos/lib/placement.min.js is unlicensed third-party
code, attributed to the wrong copyright holder
- [important] [licensing] Other third-party-derived demos/lib files and the
ASAP stanza are not represented in debian/copyright
- [important] [licensing] Minified demo files are shipped without their source
- [minor] [licensing] Adapted MIT code in src/paths lacks its upstream
copyright holders in debian/copyright
- [minor] [packaging] debian/clean does not remove the generated
dist/uPlot.min.css
You can read the full review here:
https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/reviews/node-uplot#assistant-report
Please look at it, and respond by visiting the link below (you'll be asked to
authenticate with Salsa first):
https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/llm-review/dxSSCvBK25aGJvHmRkP_UPwnsN4EKmc4
There you may choose to reject the upload yourself, while you fix issues and
re-upload, or add comments to clarify or dispute the review. Comments are
public, and in particular are shown to the DFSG reviewer with the review. You
may also use markdown in case you want to link to further clarifying
information.
If you have any questions, please reply to this e-mail and someone from the
team will respond.
Thanks!
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
