On 11-10-26 at 01:03pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> On 26/10/2011 12:54, David Paleino wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:43:33 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> >> On 15/10/2011 08:21, David Paleino wrote:
> >>> Hello everybody,
> >>> I started a first draft, based on the recent emails, of a 'Debian
> >>> though, so any help is much appreciated.
> >> Seeing the name of the package node-node-markdown, i think it's
> >> best to explain that the naming scheme is foo -> node-foo, that is,
> >> /unless/ foo is already in the node-* form.
> > ..unless there are both node-foo and foo:
> > http://search.npmjs.org/#/node-markdown (the one I packaged)
> > http://search.npmjs.org/#/markdown
> Oops sorry,
> then maybe the policy can warn those poor names actually happen :)
Policy IMO should mandate naming the binary package node-* where *
equals the name of the library as reachable in the Node environment.
Personally I did not feel it important to spell it out more explicitly
than already written, but others feel free to disagree and improve the
For comparison, see e.g. the Perl library libxml-libxml-perl :-)
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private