On 11-11-08 at 02:34pm, Patrick Ouellette wrote: > Where is the voice of the nodejs maintainers in this?
For my own part, I am following the thread, quite happy to hear the voice of the (ham) node maintainers, but wondering what is so precious about keeping the name of its binary. Form my understanding it is a daemon, which (again from my limited understanding) means normally only sysV scripts should need to know the actual name of that binary, not all sorts of locally written scripts. As has already been pointed out (but not commented on, as far as I have noticed) the nodejs binary is an interpreter as thus normally used directly in all user scripts in their hash-bang. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
