Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> writes:
> I also am biased in one direction but shall not say which as I see no
> benefit at this point in rehashing the discussion: Both packaging
> "camps" have clearly demonstrated a lack of interest in letting the
> other use the name "node", which means we must both step off of it.
> Just today there was progress on the side of Node.js - see bug#650343.
I think that having Node.js not provide the command node would be a real
disservice to our users (and I say this as someone in neither camp; I've
never used either program).
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>