Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> writes: > I also am biased in one direction but shall not say which as I see no > benefit at this point in rehashing the discussion: Both packaging > "camps" have clearly demonstrated a lack of interest in letting the > other use the name "node", which means we must both step off of it.
> Just today there was progress on the side of Node.js - see bug#650343. I think that having Node.js not provide the command node would be a real disservice to our users (and I say this as someone in neither camp; I've never used either program). -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
