Jonas Smedegaard <> writes:

> I also am biased in one direction but shall not say which as I see no 
> benefit at this point in rehashing the discussion: Both packaging 
> "camps" have clearly demonstrated a lack of interest in letting the 
> other use the name "node", which means we must both step off of it.

> Just today there was progress on the side of Node.js - see bug#650343.

I think that having Node.js not provide the command node would be a real
disservice to our users (and I say this as someone in neither camp; I've
never used either program).

Russ Allbery (               <>

Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list

Reply via email to