On 12-06-08 at 11:52am, Jérémy Lal wrote: > Hi, > it's now clearer  to me how upstream v8 release their library : > 1 - They start a new branch, say 3.10 > 2 - the first minor versions can break API (3.10.2, 3.10.4, 3.10.6) > 3 - at some point they only make patch-level versions, keeping API, > and very probably ABI compatibility too. (3.10.8.x) > The only proof i have of that is the analysis done in . > > I suggest libv8 debian package reflects this by: > * start packaging a new branch only when upstream is at stage 3 > * having a soname libv8.so.3.10.8 instead of libv8.so.188.8.131.52 > > That will have the nice effect of being able to update patch-level > versions without having to recompile reverse dependencies each time. > > The risk is letting an ABI incompatibility slip in. It would however > be caught quite early by the reverse dependencies anyway, so it seems > okay unless it happens often... > > Any advise on this please ?
Are you talking about releases to unstable, or also to experimental? Seems to me that it might make sense to release to experimental right away, and then _change_ to target unstable when judged stable. Other than that your plan looks sensible to me. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Description: Digital signature