Your message dated Sat, 25 Aug 2012 19:11:42 -0400
with message-id <50395bae.2070...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: backbone: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: 
libnode-uglify
has caused the Debian Bug report #684828,
regarding backbone: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libnode-uglify
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
684828: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684828
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: backbone
Version: 0.5.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.

Relevant part:
> ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
> │ Install backbone build dependencies (apt-based resolver)                    
>  │
> └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
> 
> Installing build dependencies
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
> Reading state information...
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> 
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>  sbuild-build-depends-backbone-dummy : Depends: libnode-uglify but it is not 
> installable
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> apt-get failed.

The full build log is available from:
   http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2012/08/14/backbone_0.5.3-2_wheezy.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi Lucas, QA contributors,

Le 14/08/2012 03:18, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> Source: backbone
[…]
> Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
> 
> Hi,
> 
> During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
> build on amd64.
[…]
>> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>>  sbuild-build-depends-backbone-dummy : Depends: libnode-uglify but it is not 
>> installable
>> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
>> apt-get failed.

Actually its an OR dependency:

 libnode-uglify | yui-compressor

The package builds fine in a Wheezy amd64 pbuilder chroot (pulling
yui-compressor), thus closing the bug. I just wanted to put some light
on this issue: maybe the resolver used to perform the archive rebuild
could be improved to avoid this kind of false positive.

I've tagged a few FTBFS on wheezy as unreproducible (because I didn't
investigate why it failed ten days ago, or because I couldn't find an
obvious reason), should I simply have closed them?

Regards

David

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=LRPM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Reply via email to