Hi all, AFAIK.. when a binary is present in a package, the package should have the be named as the binary.
But.. this is not so clear for node modules. For instance, for mocha, according with javascript policy, I should ship a package called `node-mocha' rather than one simply called `mocha'. This seems to be in contrast with perl policy (I think with python too). Should we follow this cli_based_name policy and rename those packages having binaries ? David Prevot suggests in chan: <taffit> maybe a "Provides: node-$stuff" could help in the dependency chain if needed What do you think about ? Ciao! Leo -- Ubuntu Member - http://launchpad.net/~l3on Home Page - http://leoiannacone.com GPG Key Id - 0xD282FC25 _______________________________________________ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
