On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Andrew Kelley <[email protected]> wrote: > > > node-connect-static >> >> i know it's easier said than done, but can you consider doing a PR to >> serve-static with the feature(s) you're missing ? >> >> if not, then yes, bundle it inside groovebasin. > > > I hadn't considered this. I will go ahead and make a pull request. I have > worked with one of the maintainers in the past, so maybe they will consider > it. >
I thought about this some more, and I think that I would rather not do it. As an upstream author, I think the packages are distinct. In particular, serve-static has these dependencies: serve-static (1.6.1) ├─ parseurl (~1.3.0) ├─ send (0.9.1) ├─ escape-html (1.0.1) └─ utils-merge (1.0.0) I don't want to drag these dependencies in. Additionally, serve-static and connect-static have different use cases and implementations; if they were merged then they would share no code. I think they really are distinct packages. However, as an alternative to bundling, I could see this being something like nodemodules-connect-middleware or something like that. But maybe bundling is fine since nothing else depends on connect-static as of yet.
_______________________________________________ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
