On Fri, 28 Nov 2014, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Just looking at the package name that seems not an ideal aproach: Should
> we then make packages for each combination of libraries to be merged
> together, or am I missing a more clever logic? Or do you perhaps point
No, protoaculous is a special case: the combination of these
two already exists as upstream thing.
If a “web application” needs JS merged together, it should do
Sorry for being unclear.
> I agree that too strong standardization is not good - and I disagree
> That said, I do believe Uglifyjs is the best compressor we have, and
> recomend to treat it as a "default" similar to newest GCC for C - i.e.
> use Uglifyjs unless all of...
Right. Thanks for the clarification, too.
> Because I use lynx as browser.
-- Octavio Alvarez, me and ⡍⠁⠗⠊⠕ (Mario Lang) on debian-devel