* Sebastiaan Couwenberg: " Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Current best practices
  for packaging small modules for Node.js" (Fri, 15 Jul 2016 13:50:28 +0200):

> On 07/15/2016 01:34 PM, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> > Before proceeding further I would like to get an ACK from the side of
> > pkg-javascript-devel (that this is the way to go) as well as from
> > ftpmasters, if such a package will be allowed to enter the archive.  
> In the discussion about small packages ftp-master acknowledged that we
> don't have the tools to handle bundled packages, so would accept small
> node packages for lack of a better alternative, see:
> https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/2015-August/011067.html
> Packaging the small node modules for in your dependency chain should not
> be blocked because of the small size argument.

Thanks, Bas! Didn't get down to this message supposing the thread was finished
in July...

So no more answer needed from the side of ftpmaster.



    Mathias Behrle
    PGP/GnuPG key availabable from any keyserver, ID: 0x8405BBF6

Attachment: pgpce1iDYYd11.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list

Reply via email to