On 09/21/2016 11:34 AM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> 2016-09-21 10:24 GMT+02:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org>:
>> I see you dropped support for armel in #818552 and requested the removal
>> of the outdated armel binaries. That's fine. However, nodejs doesn't
>> migrate to testing because the lack of armel binaries breaks a number
>> of packages that depend on nodejs on armel:
>>
>> trying: nodejs
>> skipped: nodejs (15, 0, 81)
>>     got: 68+546: a-3:i-18:a-0:a-11:a-0:m-0:m-0:p-35:p-0:s-1:m-546
>>     * armel: node-almond, node-groove, node-iconv, node-leveldown,
>> node-node-expat, node-sqlite3, node-topcube, node-websocket, node-ws,
>> node-xmlhttprequest, qtwebchannel5-examples
>>
>> Those need to get their armel binaries removed as well.
>>
> 
> Thank you for your help, at some point i believed the request for removal
> implied removal of dependencies as well.
> Should i make another removal request ? Would you like to do it ? I'm
> super-busy right now.

I've filed the RM bugs for the affected packages, some more may be
required for their reverse dependencies.

Kind Regards,

Bas

-- 
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Reply via email to