2016-09-21 11:53 GMT+02:00 Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebas...@xs4all.nl>:

> On 09/21/2016 11:34 AM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > 2016-09-21 10:24 GMT+02:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org>:
> >> I see you dropped support for armel in #818552 and requested the removal
> >> of the outdated armel binaries. That's fine. However, nodejs doesn't
> >> migrate to testing because the lack of armel binaries breaks a number
> >> of packages that depend on nodejs on armel:
> >>
> >> trying: nodejs
> >> skipped: nodejs (15, 0, 81)
> >>     got: 68+546: a-3:i-18:a-0:a-11:a-0:m-0:m-0:p-35:p-0:s-1:m-546
> >>     * armel: node-almond, node-groove, node-iconv, node-leveldown,
> >> node-node-expat, node-sqlite3, node-topcube, node-websocket, node-ws,
> >> node-xmlhttprequest, qtwebchannel5-examples
> >>
> >> Those need to get their armel binaries removed as well.
> >>
> >
> > Thank you for your help, at some point i believed the request for removal
> > implied removal of dependencies as well.
> > Should i make another removal request ? Would you like to do it ? I'm
> > super-busy right now.
>
> I've filed the RM bugs for the affected packages, some more may be
> required for their reverse dependencies.
>
>
Thank you. Can we close this bug now ?

Jérémy
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Reply via email to