2016-09-21 11:53 GMT+02:00 Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebas...@xs4all.nl>:
> On 09/21/2016 11:34 AM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > 2016-09-21 10:24 GMT+02:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org>:
> >> I see you dropped support for armel in #818552 and requested the removal
> >> of the outdated armel binaries. That's fine. However, nodejs doesn't
> >> migrate to testing because the lack of armel binaries breaks a number
> >> of packages that depend on nodejs on armel:
> >> trying: nodejs
> >> skipped: nodejs (15, 0, 81)
> >> got: 68+546: a-3:i-18:a-0:a-11:a-0:m-0:m-0:p-35:p-0:s-1:m-546
> >> * armel: node-almond, node-groove, node-iconv, node-leveldown,
> >> node-node-expat, node-sqlite3, node-topcube, node-websocket, node-ws,
> >> node-xmlhttprequest, qtwebchannel5-examples
> >> Those need to get their armel binaries removed as well.
> > Thank you for your help, at some point i believed the request for removal
> > implied removal of dependencies as well.
> > Should i make another removal request ? Would you like to do it ? I'm
> > super-busy right now.
> I've filed the RM bugs for the affected packages, some more may be
> required for their reverse dependencies.
Thank you. Can we close this bug now ?