On 10/09/2016 11:02 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 10/09/2016 10:25 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> Now the same is going to happen with "powerpc" arch: libv8 is actually not
>> compatible with all processors supported by debian (ppc64xx are ok, though).
>> Sebastiaan, i feel bad asking for your help again, but since you already
>> filled all the RM bugs once, i suppose you're in the best position to do it
>> for powerpc.
> Sure, the list of immediately affected packages is limited.
There has been some progress getting the RM bugs processed. Several of
for armel are still outstanding, which may be due to the dependency
problems reported by dak for reverse dependencies.
I thought that arch:all reverse dependencies didn't need to be removed
too, but I may be mistaken in that although dak has the option
--no-arch-all-rdeps for apparently that reason.
I'll follow up on the outstanding bugreports to mention that only
arch:all rdeps are reported by dak in the dependency problems.
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1