On Tuesday 22 November 2016 10:53 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Ah, I understand you now: You present breakage when using code not in > Debian. Quite confusing - please *always* mention explicitly in > bugports when using non-Debian packages!
Sorry, that was mostly meant a self note (I should have explicitly mentioned it). I ran uscan, imported the new upstream release, built the package and got the error when running it. > I only asked whether or not it was related - I did not imply it was not. > > I was genuinely confused by your terse writing style. > > Another point of confusion was that a different topic was used in the > email than in original bugreport topic. I was unaware (until digging > into archive, when in above latest post you still didn't elaborate much) > that was a wishlist bug, so assumed that your presenting code failing > was to be treated seriously. > > > With the best of intentions, Sorry about doubting your intentions, but that came as a result of so much comments on -devel about packaging so many tiny node modules. Since you already commented before to start with packaging yargs I thought it would be enough.
Description: OpenPGP digital signature