On 02/12/2016 10:12, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On 2016, ഡിസംബർ 2 2:36:04 PM IST, Paolo Greppi <paolo.gre...@libpf.com> wrote:
>> OK BTW on this one when I tried to reopen the ITP #753287 the BTS
>> replied "nope, the bug is archived!"
>> So what is best here ? To unarchive it or to open a new one ?
> I see the main purpose of ITP as way for avoiding duplication and giving a
> chance for wider community to review suitability of a proposed package. Both
> are met with the current ITP. So I think it is fine to just keep the same ITP.
OK I have unarchived, reopened and reassigned the existing ITP. I have
also set out to enable build tests + autopkgtests in this one, and in
doing so I noticed that I need end-of-stream first, see the other RFS ..
I guess we can put this one on hold and wait for node-end-of-stream so
that tests can be enabled as well.