On 02/12/2016 10:12, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On 2016, ഡിസംബർ 2 2:36:04 PM IST, Paolo Greppi <[email protected]> wrote: >> OK BTW on this one when I tried to reopen the ITP #753287 the BTS >> replied "nope, the bug is archived!" >> >> So what is best here ? To unarchive it or to open a new one ? >> > > I see the main purpose of ITP as way for avoiding duplication and giving a > chance for wider community to review suitability of a proposed package. Both > are met with the current ITP. So I think it is fine to just keep the same ITP. > OK I have unarchived, reopened and reassigned the existing ITP. I have also set out to enable build tests + autopkgtests in this one, and in doing so I noticed that I need end-of-stream first, see the other RFS ..
I guess we can put this one on hold and wait for node-end-of-stream so that tests can be enabled as well. Paolo -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
