On 03/12/2016 16:49, Paolo Greppi wrote: > On 03/12/2016 06:57, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> On ശനി 03 ഡിസംബര് 2016 06:46 രാവിലെ, Jérémy Lal wrote: >>> Bad move :) >>> What if a module is named "emoji" ? Then you'll have node-emoji >>> conflict with it. >>> node-node-emoji is the right name here. >> >> I think this is over engineering. We add node- prefix so we can have the >> same library in other languages like ruby-emoji, python-emoji etc. >> >> As for having an unlikely node-emoji and emoji modules, we can choose to >> support the better one and patch its reverse dependencies in most cases. >> If that option is not working, I think node-node- should be a last resort. > > Actually there is already a module in the npm registry called "emoji" > https://www.npmjs.com/package/emoji > but it seems less popular (963 downloads in the last month against > 1.856.808 downloads in the same period for node-emoji). The github repo > is also stuck at 2014-07-05 whereas node-emoji is more active. > > The policy within Debian is whoever gets there first can get hold of a > package name but I'd prefer to reach a consensus among us. > > Paolo
Can someone push this through ? The more I think about it the more I am convinced that node-emoji is OK Paolo -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
