On 03/12/2016 16:49, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> On 03/12/2016 06:57, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> On ശനി 03 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 06:46 രാവിലെ, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>>> Bad move :)
>>> What if a module is named "emoji" ? Then you'll have node-emoji
>>> conflict with it.
>>> node-node-emoji is the right name here.
>>
>> I think this is over engineering. We add node- prefix so we can have the
>> same library in other languages like ruby-emoji, python-emoji etc.
>>
>> As for having an unlikely node-emoji and emoji modules, we can choose to
>> support the better one and patch its reverse dependencies in most cases.
>> If that option is not working, I think node-node- should be a last resort.
> 
> Actually there is already a module in the npm registry called "emoji"
> https://www.npmjs.com/package/emoji
> but it seems less popular (963 downloads in the last month against
> 1.856.808 downloads in the same period for node-emoji). The github repo
> is also stuck at 2014-07-05 whereas node-emoji is more active.
> 
> The policy within Debian is whoever gets there first can get hold of a
> package name but I'd prefer to reach a consensus among us.
> 
> Paolo

Can someone push this through ? The more I think about it the more I am
convinced that node-emoji is OK

Paolo

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Reply via email to