Jérémy Lal <kapo...@melix.org> writes:
> - or having a reverse (build-)dependency, or what's the point ?
I am very much in favour of this: node libraries should be in Debian to
provide a library that is needed for some actual program of benefit to
But my eagerness to remove useless packages makes me worry that some
useful ones could be swept up also.
One use case I don't see addressed: How will we ensure that a library is
not needed for some other package not yet uploaded to Debian?
\ “The aim of science is not to open the door to infinite wisdom, |
`\ but to set some limit on infinite error.” —Bertolt Brecht, |
_o__) _Leben des Galilei_, 1938 |