Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > I'm lost already, sorry. As I understand the case of three.js's recent
> > rejection, no other ftp-master said anything and thus there cannot be
> > any dissention.
>
> I think it would be better if that is made explicit else how many days
> should someone wait to see no response and assume no dissent? or is to
> be always assumed there won't be any dissent?
Apologies, but this reads like another non-sequitur to me. Why would deciding
on a number of days before one can assume _no_ dissent make any difference at
all to the case of three.js given that you are claiming there _is_ dissent?
Best wishes,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
