On March 4, 2018 3:15:24 AM GMT+05:30, Simon McVittie <s...@debian.org> wrote:
>Am I right in saying that nodejs-handlebars (or libjs-handlebars or
>some
>such) contains both a command-line tool, handlebars(1) (or similar),
>and
>a library named handlebars for node.js?
Yes. handlebars binary package includes /use/bin/handlebars and
/usr/lib/nodejs/handlebars
>If I understand correctly, best practice for such libraries in other
>languages (mandatory for C and recommended for Python/Perl/etc.) is
>that
>the command-line tool is a separate binary package, for better
>discoverability (and in the case of Python, to avoid causing random
>breakage for users of the command-line tool if it originally used the
>Python 2 interpreter and gets moved to Python 3 later).
>
>For instance, src:tap.py builds python3-tap (the Python 3 library for
>"import tap"), python-tap (the Python 2 library for "import tap") and
>tappy (the tappy(1) command). If you did similar things for JavaScript,
>you could have a handlebars package that depends on libjs-handlebars
>and nodejs?
Yes, that is what I did. But it was not acceptable to waldi, when discussing
over irc. It was eventually accepted by another ftp master, but I think it
better to clarify this situation in policy.
I have provided links to irc discussion in my first mail to this thread.
> smcv
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
