On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 9:15 PM, Bill Allombert <ballo...@debian.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 02:48:40PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> > * Some Javascript modules are very small, resulting in lots of small
>> >   packages
>>
>> I think we need to balance the small packages concern with number of
>> times such small packages are used.
>>
>> node-has was rejected recently because it was "too small". I agree if
>> only one, two or even three modules depend on it embedding it is okay (I
>> have been doing that already). But when more than three modules need a
>> tiny module? Is it really better to embed it that many times?
>
> You should not embed them. Instead you can merge several tiny
> modules together and ship them as a single .deb, which eventually
> Provides: node-mod1, node-mod2 etc. So package can still Depends on the
> individual names.

Done for node-has using node-function-bind but it break uscan for node-has

Bill could you get a glimpse, I will like to create something more robust

> Cheers,
> --
> Bill. <ballo...@debian.org>
>
> Imagine a large red swirl here.
>
> --
> Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
> Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Reply via email to