[Resending including [email protected] in CC this time..]
Hi Graham,
Thanks for the followup.
> Chris, you wrote "...the test would still be unreliable whatever value
> you choose", can you propose something other than increasing the
> timeout?
Well, just to be 100% clear, I don't propose increasing the timeout at
all: I'm pretty hardcode on tests being determinstic so merely increasing
the wait time feels especially gross to me. :)
So, indeed, another solution is really required but alas I'm really not
familiar with this particular test nor this package in general so I would
not be able to comment with any authority.
Have you tried speaking to upstream?
Best wishes,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` [email protected] / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
