[Resending including 853...@bugs.debian.org in CC this time..] Hi Graham,
Thanks for the followup. > Chris, you wrote "...the test would still be unreliable whatever value > you choose", can you propose something other than increasing the > timeout? Well, just to be 100% clear, I don't propose increasing the timeout at all: I'm pretty hardcode on tests being determinstic so merely increasing the wait time feels especially gross to me. :) So, indeed, another solution is really required but alas I'm really not familiar with this particular test nor this package in general so I would not be able to comment with any authority. Have you tried speaking to upstream? Best wishes, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `- -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel