> On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 23:12:21 -0800 (PST), David Luyer wrote:
>
>> For any and all contributions I have made to JtR, please consider
>> these contributions to be licensed under GPL version 2 as of the
>> date of the submission of the patches to the JtR email list, which
>> for the mentioned files was 2005.
>
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 00:33:32 +0100, Bucsay Balázs wrote:
>
>> I think the license behove to bartavelle first, by the way gplv2 would
>> be good for me too.
>
> Bartavelle already stated a license for "all his contributions", thus
> including
> this file. You can read its statement at:
>
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-john-devel/2009-January/000251.html
>
> The text of the license is as follows:
>
>>  * This software may be modified, redistributed, and used for any
>> purpose,
>>  * so long as its origin is acknowledged.
>
> Is it ok for both of you (David and Balázs)?

In the same thread, Bartavelle previously also released his code under GPLv2:

http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-john-devel/2009-January/000247.html

Balázs above states that "gplv2 would be good for me too".

So it appears we are all happy with GPLv2 and I know Debian are generally
happy with GPLv2.  Why not just go with that?

As per Bartavelle I would also be happy to dual license any contributions
I have made if requested by SD.

David.


> For other choices, please read (also bartavelle):
>
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-john-devel/2009-January/000232.html
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-john-devel/2009-January/000258.html
>
> Kindly,
> David
>
> --
>  . ''`.  Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
>  : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
>  `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page
>    `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
>



-- 
Pkg-john-devel mailing list
Pkg-john-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-john-devel

Reply via email to