Hey, kirigami-addons_0.11.0-1 was already uploaded last August 2023 and Thorsten from the ftpmasters ask a question that never got answered, so the package got rejected after several months of no response.
I attached the mails sent by Thosten. I also try to answer the questions from Thosten: > is there a reason why you added a separate package for each module? Wouldn't it be better to have all addons in only one package? The reason to split the parts to different package is, Especially in this package: The qml modules are separated from each other and are completely independent from each other. Additionally they may move to another source package. Inside the Qt/KDE team we have our QML modules packaging guidelines: https://qt-kde-team.pages.debian.net/qmlmodulesnaming.html Sure the guideline is not a reason by it self, but current team practice, that works very well at the moment. Please give us more input, if we should change the guideline. Regards, hefee -- On Montag, 20. Mai 2024 01:04:14 CEST Debian FTP Masters wrote: > Source-only uploads to NEW are not allowed. > > binary:qml-module-org-kde-kirigami-addons-components is NEW. > binary:qml-module-org-kde-kirigami-addons-delegates is NEW. > binary:qml-module-org-kde-kirigami-addons-formcard is NEW. > binary:qml-module-org-kde-kirigami-addons-settings is NEW. > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why > your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our > concerns.
--- Begin Message ---Hi, unfortunately I didn't see any answer to my questions from some months ago, so I assume this package is no longer needed. Thorsten ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Thorsten Alteholz <[email protected]> To: Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers <[email protected]>, Pino Toscano <[email protected]> Cc: Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> Subject: Comments regarding kirigami-addons_0.11.0-1_amd64.changes Hi Pino, is there a reason why you added a separate package for each module? Wouldn't it be better to have all addons in only one package? As a general rule we want to avoid lots of tiny packages to let the packages files grow as slow as possible. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.
pgp3GKUe2U4WS.pgp
Description: PGP signature_______________________________________________ pkg-kde-extras mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Hi Pino, is there a reason why you added a separate package for each module? Wouldn't it be better to have all addons in only one package? As a general rule we want to avoid lots of tiny packages to let the packages files grow as slow as possible. Thorsten _______________________________________________ pkg-kde-extras mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
--- End Message ---
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ pkg-kde-extras mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
