On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Luka Renko wrote:
> COPYING-DOCS specifies that license is GFDL 1.2, while debian/copyright
> claims that license is GFDL 1.1.

Luka, Marco,

Thanks for the report.

I have gotten around to this and updated debian/copyright to match 
help:/digikam/index.html which is actually GFDL1.1 or later.  So while the 
upstream tarball ships with COPYING-DOCS the actual licence is per the text.

I have also updated to reflect /usr/share/common-licenses/GFDL.

I will upload the 0.9.3 package and then the 0.9.4-beta doc packages 
separately to Debian unstable/ experimental.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

pkg-kde-extras mailing list

Reply via email to