On Tuesday 19 August 2008 03:11:38 Carsten Wolff wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better, if kipi-plugins depended on imagemagick instead
> of only suggesting it?
> I could understand, that you don't want to install all those packages,
> if a user decides to use digiKam just for it's basic features. But if he
> installs kipi-plugins, he obviously wants all of those additions and
> wants them to work.
Not quite sure what problem you are reporting:
> Versions of packages kipi-plugins recommends:
> ii imagemagick 7:220.127.116.11.dfsg1-2+b2 image manipulation programs
A Recommends: means 'packages that would be found together with this one in
all but unusual installations'.
If one really wants you could install kipi-plugins without imagemagick, but it
isn't recommended, but it isn't absolutly necessary.
pkg-kde-extras mailing list