On Tuesday 19 August 2008 03:11:38 Carsten Wolff wrote: > Wouldn't it be better, if kipi-plugins depended on imagemagick instead > of only suggesting it? > I could understand, that you don't want to install all those packages, > if a user decides to use digiKam just for it's basic features. But if he > installs kipi-plugins, he obviously wants all of those additions and > wants them to work.
Hi Carsten, Not quite sure what problem you are reporting: > Versions of packages kipi-plugins recommends: > ii imagemagick 7:188.8.131.52.dfsg1-2+b2 image manipulation programs A Recommends: means 'packages that would be found together with this one in all but unusual installations'. If one really wants you could install kipi-plugins without imagemagick, but it isn't recommended, but it isn't absolutly necessary. Mark _______________________________________________ pkg-kde-extras mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras