On Tuesday 19 August 2008 03:11:38 Carsten Wolff wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better, if kipi-plugins depended on imagemagick instead
> of only suggesting it?
> I could understand, that you don't want to install all those packages,
> if a user decides to use digiKam just for it's basic features. But if he
> installs kipi-plugins, he obviously wants all of those additions and
> wants them to work.

Hi Carsten,

Not quite sure what problem you are reporting:

> Versions of packages kipi-plugins recommends:
> ii  imagemagick         7: image manipulation programs

A Recommends: means 'packages that would be found together with this one in 
all but unusual installations'.

If one really wants you could install kipi-plugins without imagemagick, but it 
isn't recommended, but it isn't absolutly necessary.


pkg-kde-extras mailing list

Reply via email to