On trečiadienis 25 Rugpjūtis 2010 18:28:12 Romain Beauxis wrote:
> I have personally switched from any network-manager to wicd for quite some
> time now and I am very happy with it. I had also a lot of weird issues with
> network-manager and I really did not appreciate its incompatibility with
> manual tools, e.g. ifconfig/iwconfig/dhclient.
> I understand your point that one user's feedback is not enough to remove
> the package for everyone. However, I wonder if, as a distribution, Debian
> has the choice to propose another network-manager for a default KDE
> install than the one shipped upstream?

I'm sorry but there is no other alternatives available *for KDE*. network-
manager-gnome pulls in a bunch of GNOME libraries which is enough 
controversial by itself for many reasons. wicd is GTK based so it could be an 
option however its look and feel still does not integrate with KDE well. Given 
that knm is good enough in many cases, I don't see a reason for 180 switching. 
By the way, have you tried a knm plasmoid? It's preferred over network-
manager-kde nowadays.

Modestas Vainius <modes...@vainius.eu>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

pkg-kde-extras mailing list

Reply via email to