Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2012 schrieb Rainer Dorsch:
> Hello,
> just wondering: does it make sense to ship wheezy with amarok 2.6beta1,
> while 2.6.0 is since many weeks in sid?
> blackbox:~# apt-cache policy amarok
> amarok:
>   Installiert:           2.6~beta1+75.g47e75df-1
>   Installationskandidat: 2.6~beta1+75.g47e75df-1
>   Versionstabelle:
>      2.6.0-1 0
>         300 sid/main i386
> Packages *** 2.6~beta1+75.g47e75df-1 0
>         500 wheezy/main i386
> Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> blackbox:~#

Thanks for mentioning that 2.6 final is in unstable.

=> problems
The package has not yet entered testing even though the 10-day delay is 
over. Check why.


=> Not touching package due to block request by freeze (contact debian-
release if update is needed)

Hmmm, might be a good idea if someone, preferably the maintainer I think 
asks for a freeze exception, provided that Amarok 2.6 is stable. Added KDE 
Extras list to cc.

I will upgrade my systems to 2.6.0-1, have a go at it and report in a few 

How is Amarok 2.6.0-1 working for you, Rainer?

Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald -
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7

pkg-kde-extras mailing list

Reply via email to