Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2012 schrieb Rainer Dorsch:
> Hello,
> 
> just wondering: does it make sense to ship wheezy with amarok 2.6beta1,
> while 2.6.0 is since many weeks in sid?
> 
> blackbox:~# apt-cache policy amarok
> amarok:
>   Installiert:           2.6~beta1+75.g47e75df-1
>   Installationskandidat: 2.6~beta1+75.g47e75df-1
>   Versionstabelle:
>      2.6.0-1 0
>         300 http://ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de/debian/ sid/main i386
> Packages *** 2.6~beta1+75.g47e75df-1 0
>         500 http://ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de/debian/ wheezy/main i386
> Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> blackbox:~#

Thanks for mentioning that 2.6 final is in unstable.

http://packages.qa.debian.org/amarok

=> problems
The package has not yet entered testing even though the 10-day delay is 
over. Check why.

=> http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=amarok

=> Not touching package due to block request by freeze (contact debian-
release if update is needed)

Hmmm, might be a good idea if someone, preferably the maintainer I think 
asks for a freeze exception, provided that Amarok 2.6 is stable. Added KDE 
Extras list to cc.

I will upgrade my systems to 2.6.0-1, have a go at it and report in a few 
days.

How is Amarok 2.6.0-1 working for you, Rainer?

Thanks,
-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7

_______________________________________________
pkg-kde-extras mailing list
pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras

Reply via email to