Am Donnerstag, 29. November 2012 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
> Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2012 schrieb Rainer Dorsch:
> > Hello,
> > just wondering: does it make sense to ship wheezy with amarok
> > 2.6beta1, while 2.6.0 is since many weeks in sid?
> > blackbox:~# apt-cache policy amarok
> > amarok:
> > Installiert: 2.6~beta1+75.g47e75df-1
> > Installationskandidat: 2.6~beta1+75.g47e75df-1
> > Versionstabelle:
> > 2.6.0-1 0
> > 300 http://ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de/debian/ sid/main i386
> > Packages *** 2.6~beta1+75.g47e75df-1 0
> > 500 http://ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de/debian/ wheezy/main i386
> > Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> > blackbox:~#
> Thanks for mentioning that 2.6 final is in unstable.
> => problems
> The package has not yet entered testing even though the 10-day delay is
> over. Check why.
> => http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=amarok
> => Not touching package due to block request by freeze (contact debian-
> release if update is needed)
> Hmmm, might be a good idea if someone, preferably the maintainer I
> think asks for a freeze exception, provided that Amarok 2.6 is stable.
> Added KDE Extras list to cc.
> I will upgrade my systems to 2.6.0-1, have a go at it and report in a
> few days.
Update: I already have it on one box, since that box is Sid. And there it
is working nicely with Phonon VLC.
Will make sure to have 2.6.0-1 on my Amarok machine sitting on my Hi-Fi
equipment as well.
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
pkg-kde-extras mailing list