Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2013 10:52:13 +1100
with message-id <1695425.0f5O1J2JvO@acer>
and subject line Re: Bug#661796: digikam: Vignet album as folder icon
has caused the Debian Bug report #661796,
regarding digikam: Vignet album as folder icon
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact

Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: digikam
Version: 4:2.6.0~beta1-1
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
For every album is it possible to define an icon.

   * What was the outcome of this action?
It put an image visible into the browser of digikam, but it didn't update the file to make it available at kde level (or gnome level, it is the
same way !)...

   * What outcome did you expect instead?
Synchronise folder icon and digikam one's to improve the user experience :)

Best regards


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages digikam depends on:
ii  digikam-data            4:2.6.0~beta1-1
ii  kde-runtime             4:4.7.4-1
ii  libc6                   2.13-26
ii  libgcc1                 1:4.6.2-12
ii  libgomp1                4.6.2-12
ii  libgphoto2-2            2.4.11-4
ii  libgphoto2-port0        2.4.11-4
ii  libjasper1              1.900.1-13
ii  libjpeg8                8d-1
ii  libkdcraw20             4:4.7.4-1
ii  libkdecore5             4:4.7.4-1
ii  libkdeui5               4:4.7.4-1
ii  libkdewebkit5           4:4.7.4-1
ii  libkexiv2-10            4:4.7.4-1
ii  libkfile4               4:4.7.4-1
ii  libkhtml5               4:4.7.4-1
ii  libkio5                 4:4.7.4-1
ii  libkipi8                4:4.7.4-1
ii  libknotifyconfig4       4:4.7.4-1
ii  libkparts4              4:4.7.4-1
ii  liblcms1                1.19.dfsg-1+b1
ii  liblensfun0             0.2.5-2
ii  liblqr-1-0              0.4.1-1.1
ii  libmarblewidget12       4:4.7.4-1
ii  libnepomuk4             4:4.7.4-1
ii  libopencv-core2.3       2.3.1-7
ii  libopencv-highgui2.3    2.3.1-7
ii  libopencv-imgproc2.3    2.3.1-7
ii  libopencv-legacy2.3     2.3.1-7
ii  libopencv-objdetect2.3  2.3.1-7
ii  libphonon4              4:
ii  libpng12-0              1.2.46-5
ii  libqjson0               0.7.1-6
ii  libqt4-dbus             4:4.8.0-1
ii  libqt4-network          4:4.8.0-1
ii  libqt4-qt3support       4:4.8.0-1
ii  libqt4-sql              4:4.8.0-1
ii  libqt4-sql-sqlite       4:4.8.0-1
ii  libqt4-xml              4:4.8.0-1
ii  libqtcore4              4:4.8.0-1
ii  libqtgui4               4:4.8.0-1
ii  libqtwebkit4            2.2.1-1
ii  libsolid4               4:4.7.4-1
ii  libsoprano4             2.7.3+dfsg.1-1
ii  libstdc++6              4.6.2-12
ii  libtiff4                3.9.5-2
ii  libx11-6                2:
ii  phonon                  4:

Versions of packages digikam recommends:
ii  chromium [www-browser]              17.0.963.56~r121963-1
ii  google-chrome-stable [www-browser]  17.0.963.56-r121963
ii  iceweasel [www-browser]             10.0.2-1
ii  kipi-plugins                        4:2.6.0~beta1-1
ii  konqueror [www-browser]             4:4.7.4-1
ii  mplayerthumbs                       4:4.7.4-1
ii  opera [www-browser]                 11.61.1250
ii  w3m [www-browser]                   0.5.3-5

Versions of packages digikam suggests:
pn  digikam-doc  <none>

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 11:53:01 Mourad Jaber wrote:
> Version: 4:2.6.0~beta1-1


I have closed this report as it is against a very old version of digikam which 
is no longer supported by Debian.

I am sorry we have not been able to resolve this issue for you.

Upstream also provide support for digikam here:

If this is an ongoing issue, could I ask you to file a new report against a 
newer version of digikam which is supported by Debian.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

--- End Message ---
pkg-kde-extras mailing list

Reply via email to