On Thursday 28 May 2015 14:05:18 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: [snip] > > It won't hurt to upload the experimental version around the same time as > > kamoso though if you want to, since we'll have to wait for kamoso to age > > anyway. > > I'm afraid it's still not clear to me if you are referring to qapt (which > seems to have built fine) or qtgstreamer :-/
I have just understood how the situation is. The bad news are that the experimental version can't be pushed to unstable until kf5 is in it, which means waiting for Qt 5.4.2... not a solution now. **BUT** the good news are that qapt does not expose any gstreamer API, which means that even if the package names are deceptive they should just work as they already are. And that's why a simple binNMU just worked. So I would just simply keep the version in sid as it is, we will push the newer version with proper naming with kf5. Thanks a lot for your work! -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ pkg-kde-extras mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras