On 15 September 2017 at 06:31, Ralf Jung <p...@ralfj.de> wrote:
> Hi,
[snip]
> lightdm-kde upstream seems entirely dead for 4 years now.  I won't do a
> port to Qt5.  So I guess what I should do is ask for lightm-kde to be
> removed from the repository.  Lisandro, can I wait with that until you
> really remove Qt4 or should I rather do this ASAP?

First of all, thanks you all for your replies.

Ideally they should get removed *before* qt4 itself, but there is no
need to rush. A good moment to consider asking for their removals is
whenever we set the bugs' severities to important, which won't happen
soon. On the other hand, knowing that you already stated that they can
be removed alongside Qt 4 itself I *will* ask for their removal citing
your replies whenever we get to remove Qt4. But again, the sooner the
better, as some other packages might be depending on yours (you won't
believe the amount of strange things you might find out when removing
packages...).

Thanks!

-- 
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/

_______________________________________________
pkg-kde-extras mailing list
pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras

Reply via email to