Hey Aurélien, > I’ve gone the hard way. ;-) > And it looks like it was a good idea, you may have seen that it prompted a > bit of a discussion [0] with some interesting input. > The general consensus is against bumping epoch, and in particular there is > a strong rule against ever having 2 packages with the same upstream > versions, even with different epochs in order not to break various archive > tools. Which would be a risk if we just bumped the epoch and the new elisa > catches up with some existing versions of the old elisa project. > > So we’re left with keeping elisa and version 1.1+really0.2.1 or using > another package name like elisa-music-player and keeping version to 0.2.1. > I tend to prefer the first option as we can hope to catch up with the > former project’s version and in the end just have the plain "elisa" package > name.
me personally dislike the +really versions, because IMO it is harder to parse for humans, but I'm fine with doing an upload with that version number. And the other solution having a different package name is also not a nice solution. Aurélien ping me, if you updated the version number and the package is ready again for upload. hefee
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
