El jue., 14 nov. 2019 15:22, Dmitry Shachnev <[email protected]> escribió:
> Hi Lisandro! > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 03:12:48PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez > Meyer wrote: > > > 1) Should we create new Architecture: all packages (like qt*-doc-dev), > to > > > contain the .tags and examples-manifest.xml files? > > > > > > 2) If yes, should it contain both these files or only one of them? Also > > > should we do it for all submodules, or only for those 6 modules listed > > > above? > > > > > > 3) If no, should we make qt*-dev or qt*-examples recommend > qt*-doc-html? > > > > > > Note that if the answer is ‘yes’, then we would need to do from 6 to > ~30 > > > uploads to NEW. (This is why I lean towards ‘no’.) > > > > This is my personal opinion, but feel free to implement whatever you see > most > > fit, you are the one doing the job :-) > > > > My first approach to this would be: > > > > - Creating qt*-dev-doc shipping only the .tags, and just one -dev-doc per > > submodule. Gotcha in this: if this creates a link in the doc, it should > also > > create a strict dependency in the right -doc package... :S > > Do you think it should be named -dev-doc or -doc-dev? I prefer the latter, > because it contains development files for those who want to link to the > documentation. > doc-dev, I misspelled it. > Also what link do you mean? I do not plan to symlink anything, just split > the > file(s) into a separate package. Applications generating documentation will create a link against qt doc. I mean, not at the packaging level, but as their final result. Also I don’t want to make that package depend on the main -doc-html package. > Because the only benefit of splitting is reducing size of Build-Depends in > some packages. And this benefit will be lost. > > > - Make qt*-examples recommend (or even depend upon) qt*-doc-html. If you > are > > trying to test examples you are probably trying to read the related > doc too. > > Such a dependency is fine for me. > > > Of course this would be my first approach, it can be changed upon > discussion :-) > > What is your opinion on question 2)? Should we make such a split in all Qt > modules, or only where we cannot move the .tags files directly to -dev? > The later. >
-- https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
